I learned from the Econ department today that they couldn't get approval for the course from LAS (meaning LAS wouldn't pay for it) so the course was cancelled as an offering. Going through the ICES for our class last fall, while most students had no prior opinion, a handful of students had a prior positive opinion of the course and/or of me. I'm guessing the same thing might be true for next fall. So...
If there are some students who would want to take it as an independent study, that might be possible. If you know somebody like that you should have that person contact me to explore further. Note that independent studies are 199, 299, or 399, but not 499. So it won't fill the upper level course in the major requirement. It would just be an independent study.
Wednesday, April 11, 2018
Wednesday, April 4, 2018
Cows in Greece/ICES Reviewed/An Interesting Piece from HBR
Q: What do cows in Greece say?
-------
Because of the stress fracture in my foot (which has healed pretty much now) I didn't go to the Econ Department this semester till today. So I finally had a chance to look at what you wrote on your ICES forms. Here are a few reactions to that.
Nobody wrote explicitly about Akerlof's Gift Exchange Model, which is one of my favorite parts of the course, but one student put it into practice by using the comments section to tell a joke. This was reciprocation for the "Quizzes" we did to start class sessions near the end of the semester. Reciprocation is part and parcel of gift exchange, so I liked that very much, even if the joke otherwise didn't speak to the subject matter of the course.
Among others who commented, some had positive things to say but even for them the course was not a "home run." One might ask why (I will speculate on that below). Others were more critical.
I think there is a fundamental disagreement between many of the students and me about what a good course should be like, whether it is my course or some other. I am much more interested in developing general thinking and life skills than I am in communicating specific content that you need to master. On the other hand, I believe that most of you need to engage far more with the subject matter than you did to use the course as a way to practice developing those thinking and life skills. I encourage you to look at the next section and ask yourself whether your courses are preparing you to be effective in a problem solving team, which might be one way to reflect on the education you have been getting.
I know that not everyone was there the first day of the semester, but for those of you who were there, you may recall we asked about the purpose of our class, which was to produce human capital. We then asked who owns the human capital. Each student owns their own human capital. The question then, is whether you were showing good ownership skills in the way you went about the course or if there is a fundamental moral hazard, students focus on grades to the detriment of better developing their own human capital. It's a question that each student should try to answer.
One student made, I thought, an interesting observation about liking the discussion based approach, but that my leading questions often didn't get answered well. I would agree with that observation, but I'm not sure why. The article I will mention in the next section says that effective groups have members who feel safe in that environment, so are willing to participate vigorously. I wonder if many of you didn't feel safe in Econ 490, as far as responding to those leading questions, so opted out instead. If so and if you have some further thoughts on what might be done to make the class feel safer, I'd appreciate getting those ideas. I have been thinking about starting the semester with those joke quizzes and not saving them for near the end, but I wonder if students would just think of them as daffy rather than as ice breakers.
--------
This is the piece from HBR on good problem solving teams. It's a pretty quick read but you might get the bulk of the message in the piece just from the bi-matrix in different shades of blue, found around the middle of the article, and then focus on the upper right cell, Generative Teams.
I thought this piece a good complement to Bolman and Deal Chapter 8, particularly the part about Argyris and Schon Models 1 and 2. That chapter focuses on the style of the leader. The HBR piece focuses on the culture of the group. But they seem to me to be mirror images of one another. A generative team needs a model 2 leader.
---------
The bulk of the respondents to the ICES were seniors. I know some of you have graduated already. Many others will be graduating soon. This is probably my last post on the site (unless something dramatic happens to Yankees between now and the end of the semester). So let me close by wishing you good luck in your future endeavors.
-------
Because of the stress fracture in my foot (which has healed pretty much now) I didn't go to the Econ Department this semester till today. So I finally had a chance to look at what you wrote on your ICES forms. Here are a few reactions to that.
Nobody wrote explicitly about Akerlof's Gift Exchange Model, which is one of my favorite parts of the course, but one student put it into practice by using the comments section to tell a joke. This was reciprocation for the "Quizzes" we did to start class sessions near the end of the semester. Reciprocation is part and parcel of gift exchange, so I liked that very much, even if the joke otherwise didn't speak to the subject matter of the course.
Among others who commented, some had positive things to say but even for them the course was not a "home run." One might ask why (I will speculate on that below). Others were more critical.
I think there is a fundamental disagreement between many of the students and me about what a good course should be like, whether it is my course or some other. I am much more interested in developing general thinking and life skills than I am in communicating specific content that you need to master. On the other hand, I believe that most of you need to engage far more with the subject matter than you did to use the course as a way to practice developing those thinking and life skills. I encourage you to look at the next section and ask yourself whether your courses are preparing you to be effective in a problem solving team, which might be one way to reflect on the education you have been getting.
I know that not everyone was there the first day of the semester, but for those of you who were there, you may recall we asked about the purpose of our class, which was to produce human capital. We then asked who owns the human capital. Each student owns their own human capital. The question then, is whether you were showing good ownership skills in the way you went about the course or if there is a fundamental moral hazard, students focus on grades to the detriment of better developing their own human capital. It's a question that each student should try to answer.
One student made, I thought, an interesting observation about liking the discussion based approach, but that my leading questions often didn't get answered well. I would agree with that observation, but I'm not sure why. The article I will mention in the next section says that effective groups have members who feel safe in that environment, so are willing to participate vigorously. I wonder if many of you didn't feel safe in Econ 490, as far as responding to those leading questions, so opted out instead. If so and if you have some further thoughts on what might be done to make the class feel safer, I'd appreciate getting those ideas. I have been thinking about starting the semester with those joke quizzes and not saving them for near the end, but I wonder if students would just think of them as daffy rather than as ice breakers.
--------
This is the piece from HBR on good problem solving teams. It's a pretty quick read but you might get the bulk of the message in the piece just from the bi-matrix in different shades of blue, found around the middle of the article, and then focus on the upper right cell, Generative Teams.
I thought this piece a good complement to Bolman and Deal Chapter 8, particularly the part about Argyris and Schon Models 1 and 2. That chapter focuses on the style of the leader. The HBR piece focuses on the culture of the group. But they seem to me to be mirror images of one another. A generative team needs a model 2 leader.
---------
The bulk of the respondents to the ICES were seniors. I know some of you have graduated already. Many others will be graduating soon. This is probably my last post on the site (unless something dramatic happens to Yankees between now and the end of the semester). So let me close by wishing you good luck in your future endeavors.
Tuesday, March 6, 2018
Some Interesting Reading For Over Your Holiday
With spring break coming up, I thought you might find the message below interesting. It was sent to a student who took Econ of Organizations in 2016 and is having me mentor him now. We met yesterday and discussed a short story, Flowers for Algernon, that makes for an interesting read. It subsequently was made into a movie, Charly, and a book length version of the story was also produced.
* * * * *
Here are a few pieces to look at that come out of our discussion today. BTW, Flowers for Algernon came out in 1959, according to the ever reliable Wikipedia.
This one is from 2005. It is about child precocity and whether that predicts adult genius. It includes the work of Terman, whom I mentioned in our discussion. The Prodigy Puzzle
This one is from a few years ago, and is about ordinary people and their attitudes toward creativity. It argues that everyone likes creativity in retrospect, but most people don't like it in prospect, because it is incurring risk. Most people want to reduce risk and therefore block creative efforts. Inside the Box
And this last one is the blog post I wrote, which gets at the emotional side of worrying about our impact on others and how it should guide our behavior. Retards
Professor Arvan
* * * * *
On a different but related note, as part of my volunteer work, I recently purchased a pro account for Zoom, an online video conferencing product. It seems to work better than the video conferencing in Skype or Facebook, and the paid account has some features about recording a meeting that the free account doesn't have.
I mention this because I will be a bachelor during much of spring break, just Ginger (our dog) and me. The rest of the family is visiting my younger son out west. So I would be up for trying a call with some students then, or even just one on one, if that possibly sounds like fun for you rather than drudgery. If this interests you, send me an email and we'll try to set something up.
Finally, I was totally flummoxed that the Big Ten Men's basketball tournament ended on Sunday, but the rest of college basketball is finishing up this week. Eve if the Illini won't make the NCAA tournament, I do root for the Big Ten. Thais has got to hurt their chances.
* * * * *
Here are a few pieces to look at that come out of our discussion today. BTW, Flowers for Algernon came out in 1959, according to the ever reliable Wikipedia.
This one is from 2005. It is about child precocity and whether that predicts adult genius. It includes the work of Terman, whom I mentioned in our discussion. The Prodigy Puzzle
This one is from a few years ago, and is about ordinary people and their attitudes toward creativity. It argues that everyone likes creativity in retrospect, but most people don't like it in prospect, because it is incurring risk. Most people want to reduce risk and therefore block creative efforts. Inside the Box
And this last one is the blog post I wrote, which gets at the emotional side of worrying about our impact on others and how it should guide our behavior. Retards
Professor Arvan
* * * * *
On a different but related note, as part of my volunteer work, I recently purchased a pro account for Zoom, an online video conferencing product. It seems to work better than the video conferencing in Skype or Facebook, and the paid account has some features about recording a meeting that the free account doesn't have.
I mention this because I will be a bachelor during much of spring break, just Ginger (our dog) and me. The rest of the family is visiting my younger son out west. So I would be up for trying a call with some students then, or even just one on one, if that possibly sounds like fun for you rather than drudgery. If this interests you, send me an email and we'll try to set something up.
Finally, I was totally flummoxed that the Big Ten Men's basketball tournament ended on Sunday, but the rest of college basketball is finishing up this week. Eve if the Illini won't make the NCAA tournament, I do root for the Big Ten. Thais has got to hurt their chances.
Monday, February 26, 2018
Relativity - In Pricing
You may have learned this line somewhere along the way in English class.
It turns out, it doesn't hold in retail sales. Shoppers seem to prefer dishonesty in the pricing approach! They want to get good deals, even when it really is no deal at all. The linked piece explains this and makes for a good read.
O, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive!
Sir Walter Scott
It turns out, it doesn't hold in retail sales. Shoppers seem to prefer dishonesty in the pricing approach! They want to get good deals, even when it really is no deal at all. The linked piece explains this and makes for a good read.
Thursday, February 22, 2018
Sunday, February 4, 2018
Sharing The Marbles Revisited
I thought this piece was interesting. The underlying question is which poor people are deserving of of receiving government subsidies and transfer payments. Note that at present the unemployment rate is quite low by historical standards, near 4%, but the labor force participation rate is also quite low by historical standards. Are there people out of the labor market who really should be looking for work? If so, what is the way to determine who these people are?
A particularly troubling case, not considered in the article, is that of veterans who are now homeless. When you think through your own views on these matters, you might try to apply those views to the case of homeless veterans and see what you concluded there.
A particularly troubling case, not considered in the article, is that of veterans who are now homeless. When you think through your own views on these matters, you might try to apply those views to the case of homeless veterans and see what you concluded there.
Saturday, February 3, 2018
Discussion Group
We're now meeting on Fridays at 1:30 in BIF. If you'd like to join us, please do. But drop me a note ahead of time so you can get caught up and participate in the conversation.
Wednesday, January 24, 2018
Something Other Than Illinibucks For Professor Arvan
I've had some recent experiences where life seems to imitate what we studied last semester.
Something bad happened to my right foot. It ultimately proved to be a stress fracture, but it took quite a while to conclude that was the cause. Here's the story.
I got a pain in the ball of my right foot about a week earlier. Such pains are not that unusual for me. I had that happen a couple of times during our course, but in the left foot. After a few days, the pain would go away. So in this case, I did nothing about it, hoping for the same outcome. For a few days, it did seem to be getting better. But then it started to get worse (which is probably when the fracture occurred, from walking on the foot in an awkward way so as to reduce the pain). After a day or so of that I made an appointment to see my health provider.
The physical exam revealed a lot of tenderness and swelling in the foot. They also ordered x-rays. They revealed an old injury but no new problem. An appointment with a podiatrist was made for 10 days later.
I was very disappointed with this outcome. There was a lot of pain and I wanted them to do something then and there to treat it. They prescribed medication to reduce the swelling. And they had given me some meds for the pain, but I thought that was too mild. They didn't give me any external protection for the foot. I was told to keep the foot elevated (good advice). Yet I was pretty convinced that wasn't sufficient for the foot to heal by itself.
So I did something I wouldn't normally encourage others to do. I wrote an impassioned letter to the guy who did the surgery on my shoulder back in 2012, asked him whether he could look at my x-rays, and if he could offer any access to treatment that would help. He took my letter to heart. He got me into seeing a podiatrist this past Monday, in effect, jumping the line. I was pretty desperate so didn't feel guilty about getting privileged treatment this way.
They did another set of x-rays. The new ones (barely) showed a stress fracture. What I learned from the experience is that a stress fracture takes time to be visible under x-ray. So the first time around, it simply wasn't visible at all. They based their recommendation for treatment more on the x-rays than on the physical exam. (Think about our discussions of monitoring and whether it reveals shirking or not.)
This time they gave me a removable boot to wear that protects the foot, makes it much less painful while walking, and should expedite the healing. I also got stronger pain meds, but had to make a special request for that.
I am now in recovery mode (it takes about 8 weeks to heal) and partly telling this story because I'm looking for light hearted entertainment to bide my time. If you have any more jokes like the ones we did as quizzes in class, please post those as comments or send to me in email. And if you have any other sorts of entertainment you might recommend (stuff your parents or grandparents might like) you can post on that as well.
I hope your semester has gotten off well for those of you who remain on campus. And for those of you have graduated and left the area, I'm also curious about what you are doing now. Whatever that is, I hope life is treating you well.
Best,
Professor Arvan
Something bad happened to my right foot. It ultimately proved to be a stress fracture, but it took quite a while to conclude that was the cause. Here's the story.
I got a pain in the ball of my right foot about a week earlier. Such pains are not that unusual for me. I had that happen a couple of times during our course, but in the left foot. After a few days, the pain would go away. So in this case, I did nothing about it, hoping for the same outcome. For a few days, it did seem to be getting better. But then it started to get worse (which is probably when the fracture occurred, from walking on the foot in an awkward way so as to reduce the pain). After a day or so of that I made an appointment to see my health provider.
The physical exam revealed a lot of tenderness and swelling in the foot. They also ordered x-rays. They revealed an old injury but no new problem. An appointment with a podiatrist was made for 10 days later.
I was very disappointed with this outcome. There was a lot of pain and I wanted them to do something then and there to treat it. They prescribed medication to reduce the swelling. And they had given me some meds for the pain, but I thought that was too mild. They didn't give me any external protection for the foot. I was told to keep the foot elevated (good advice). Yet I was pretty convinced that wasn't sufficient for the foot to heal by itself.
So I did something I wouldn't normally encourage others to do. I wrote an impassioned letter to the guy who did the surgery on my shoulder back in 2012, asked him whether he could look at my x-rays, and if he could offer any access to treatment that would help. He took my letter to heart. He got me into seeing a podiatrist this past Monday, in effect, jumping the line. I was pretty desperate so didn't feel guilty about getting privileged treatment this way.
They did another set of x-rays. The new ones (barely) showed a stress fracture. What I learned from the experience is that a stress fracture takes time to be visible under x-ray. So the first time around, it simply wasn't visible at all. They based their recommendation for treatment more on the x-rays than on the physical exam. (Think about our discussions of monitoring and whether it reveals shirking or not.)
This time they gave me a removable boot to wear that protects the foot, makes it much less painful while walking, and should expedite the healing. I also got stronger pain meds, but had to make a special request for that.
I am now in recovery mode (it takes about 8 weeks to heal) and partly telling this story because I'm looking for light hearted entertainment to bide my time. If you have any more jokes like the ones we did as quizzes in class, please post those as comments or send to me in email. And if you have any other sorts of entertainment you might recommend (stuff your parents or grandparents might like) you can post on that as well.
I hope your semester has gotten off well for those of you who remain on campus. And for those of you have graduated and left the area, I'm also curious about what you are doing now. Whatever that is, I hope life is treating you well.
Best,
Professor Arvan
Saturday, January 6, 2018
We Called It Strategically Misrepresenting One's Preferences
This piece gives a different meaning to "being a born liar." I thought the thesis surprising, so possibly interesting for you. Also note, social science of this sort should be viewed with a skeptical eye - you should not take it as the last word on the matter. Given that caveat, it is interesting to ponder. And if you have some experience observing younger children (2 or 3 years of age) you might ask whether this jives with what you have observed.
On a different note, I hope you are relaxing in some reasonably warm climate. It has been terribly cold in CU for about a week. I, for one, am ready for some more moderate weather.
On a different note, I hope you are relaxing in some reasonably warm climate. It has been terribly cold in CU for about a week. I, for one, am ready for some more moderate weather.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)